As an advocate of Prequels in general, I wanted to try watching a Prequel to something I don't know the original story for. I heard of this recently and that it was pretty good. As you may know the only Gundam series I was previously familiar with is Gundam 00 which is not part of the Universal Century continuity.
Four Episodes are available, only the third has an after credits scene. All four are Dubbed already, which is good, in Japan some characters are still voiced by the same actors who voiced them 40 years ago even though they are younger here. I don't want to deal with that.
After watching them I learned that this isn't really a Prequel to the existing continuity but more of a Reboot that starts at an earlier point. Still a similar concept.
Overall I like it, the first episode is difficult to get into at first. What it needed was some narration set up at the beginning, like the 2nd, 3rd and 4th episodes had.
From the vague knowledge I had of Gundam going in I was easily able to guess who was supposed to be Char. Gundam gets called the Star Wars of Japan, and Char the Darth Vader of Japan. In some ways I think how this handles Char is how many Prequel haterss would have wanted Anakin to be written, someone introverted who doesn't much express his emotional angst. But Lucas had a specific point to make about Anakin not being cut out for the Stoic nature of what the Jedi Order had become. And in the OT Darth Vader was not exactly someone who restrained himself.
I think this could be a good introduction to the franchise for new fans. I don't think I could ever watch the original Gundam, I simply don't like how most 70s Anime looked. Here, it is hilarious how some characters look obviously like their original character designs were made in the 70s, but others not so much.
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
Yuki Kajiura is the John Williams of Anime
There are a lot of potential candidates for the title of all time best director or best actor in Hollywood. But I think few would dispute that the all time greatest composer of Film Scores is John Williams.
Between Jaws, Star Wars, Superman, Indiana Jones, Jurassic Park and Harry Potter, he's made most of the most Iconic film scores of all time. Harry Potter is the only of those franchises I haven't seen, but I still recognize the Music when I hear it.
Who are the top composers of other mediums? Back when G4 still existed and still had more then just one show about Video Games. I watched a half hour biography they did of the main Composer of the Final Fantasy series. He seems like a good candidate, but to me the most personally Iconic video game music is definitely the music from Nintendo first party titles.
But I think easily the John Williams of Anime is Yuki Kajiura.
She did Noir, my favorite Anime, largely the reason I got into anime. It's soundtrack is still the only Anime soundtrack I've ever bought on CD. And to this day it holds up, I can put that Music on my not quite an IPod and go weeks listening to no Music other then it.
After that she's done it's sister series, Madlax and El Cazador de la Bruja. Puella Magi Madoka Magica, Fate/Zero and Sword Art Online. And many others I still haven't watched yet, some I intend to try soon. There are some where her Music is the only nice thing some people have to say about it, not unlike how SW Prequel haters feel about their Music.
Can any other Anime composer compete? Lots of Anime have memorable opening and closing themes, but nothing epic in terms of score. Death Note's score is memorable mostly for how obviously it's going for an Omen vibe, and that's fine, it works great for what Death Note was doing. And you've got lots of Anime where the characters are making Music in the show. Evangelion is an anime who's most disappointing quality was it's music, I love that Bohemian Rhapsody AMV because I feel it tells the story musically far better. The music of Fate/Stay Night: Unlimited Blade Works does as well as it does largely because it's following Fate/Zero's lead, knowing Yuki will be back for the Heaven's Feel movie has me even more excited for it, it's too bad the Dub probably won't get a theatrical release.
The only Anime who's score can compete with Yuki Kajiura scores is Revolutionary Girl Utena. And it had two composers, the Duel Themes were done by a different composer then the rest. And neither had done anything else I'm currently familiar with, partly because not much else that is considered a must watch.
So for the time being I feel there is little competition for Yuki Kajiura as the best Anime Composer.
Between Jaws, Star Wars, Superman, Indiana Jones, Jurassic Park and Harry Potter, he's made most of the most Iconic film scores of all time. Harry Potter is the only of those franchises I haven't seen, but I still recognize the Music when I hear it.
Who are the top composers of other mediums? Back when G4 still existed and still had more then just one show about Video Games. I watched a half hour biography they did of the main Composer of the Final Fantasy series. He seems like a good candidate, but to me the most personally Iconic video game music is definitely the music from Nintendo first party titles.
But I think easily the John Williams of Anime is Yuki Kajiura.
She did Noir, my favorite Anime, largely the reason I got into anime. It's soundtrack is still the only Anime soundtrack I've ever bought on CD. And to this day it holds up, I can put that Music on my not quite an IPod and go weeks listening to no Music other then it.
After that she's done it's sister series, Madlax and El Cazador de la Bruja. Puella Magi Madoka Magica, Fate/Zero and Sword Art Online. And many others I still haven't watched yet, some I intend to try soon. There are some where her Music is the only nice thing some people have to say about it, not unlike how SW Prequel haters feel about their Music.
Can any other Anime composer compete? Lots of Anime have memorable opening and closing themes, but nothing epic in terms of score. Death Note's score is memorable mostly for how obviously it's going for an Omen vibe, and that's fine, it works great for what Death Note was doing. And you've got lots of Anime where the characters are making Music in the show. Evangelion is an anime who's most disappointing quality was it's music, I love that Bohemian Rhapsody AMV because I feel it tells the story musically far better. The music of Fate/Stay Night: Unlimited Blade Works does as well as it does largely because it's following Fate/Zero's lead, knowing Yuki will be back for the Heaven's Feel movie has me even more excited for it, it's too bad the Dub probably won't get a theatrical release.
The only Anime who's score can compete with Yuki Kajiura scores is Revolutionary Girl Utena. And it had two composers, the Duel Themes were done by a different composer then the rest. And neither had done anything else I'm currently familiar with, partly because not much else that is considered a must watch.
So for the time being I feel there is little competition for Yuki Kajiura as the best Anime Composer.
Sunday, March 5, 2017
The Lion King is more like Horus then Hamlet
First I recommend you watch this video on YouTube from KyleKallgrenBHH.
I have long felt that The Lion King's connection to Hamlet is overstated, and on that subject this is a great video.
He also laments how we commonly fail to look for African inspiration for the story. The African legend he talks about, Sundiata, is pretty interesting and I think may well be relevant. But there is another Nation in Africa who's mythology has long been what the story of The Lion King first makes me think of.
Egypt, which called itself Kemet.
Simba = Horus
Mufasa = Osiris
Scar = Set
BTW, Scar is depicted as arguably vaguely Homosexual and Set's stories also have some homoerotic undertones to them.
Now we should remember that Set wasn't so firmly vilified originally. But because the Hyksos foreign occupiers favored him so heavily, Set's reputation took a nose dive during (most of) the New Kingdom. And in The Lion King the Hyena's could perhaps be viewed as representing those foreign oppressors.
Of course Egypt being one of the most Ancient nations on Earth, and which had long periods of influence and contact with other regions, means that this pattern was mimicked elsewhere quite frequently. And perhaps even Egypt didn't do it first, but from what we can verify their version was probably the first written down.
In Greek mythology there was Perseus who it seems may have originally been fathered by Proteus, the brother of Acrisius, not Zeus. Which in turn influenced Herodotus's version of the biography of Cyrus.
Kyle talks in the video about how every work has many ancestors. I feel like noting how a writer may not always be consciously aware of what's influencing them. I know because of who I've spent my time with I've spent a lot of time seeing and hearing movies and TVshows I would never have chosen to watch on my own. And I have vague memories of things I do not remember the name of, or maybe never knew.
Kyle chose Moses as a potential Biblical example. I would have picked David as a future King who spent time in Exile, though there is also Hadad of Edom in 1 Kings 11. And then Athaliah as a blatant Usurper. I also have a tendency to suspect Jehosheba and Athaliah are echoed in the tale of Snow White.
But also as a Christian I could compare this pattern to The Bible's overall depiction of Satan as the current Archon of the Kosmos and god of this Aion, having stolen the Dominion from Adam. And Jesus as The Son of Adam who will restore everything.
While Shakespeare's Hamlet fails to be like The Lion King or the story of Horus due to how Hamlet never takes the Throne or cares to. In the original Danish legend of Amleth he actually does become King.
Other plays of Shakespeare also echo this pattern. You can see it somewhat in the Henriad as Kyle points out. Macbeth, Richard III and King John are all plays where the title character is kind of the Set figure.
Paul Feval novels where this pattern is reflected include Revenants, and the DeClare story in The Blackcoats: Heart of Steele.
In Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope, the original backstory we are given made Anakin Skywalker and Darth Vader kind of surrogate brothers, students of the same master. In which case Anakin becomes Osiris, Vader is Set and Luke is Horus. Later when we learn the truth this analogy doesn't really change, Osiris and Set simply become two sides of the same person. Even the Dismemberment theme may go back to Horus castrating Set. So yes you can say that the voice of Mufasa had previously voiced Scar.
In Super Mario RPG The Legend of The Seven Stars, Mallow is a rightful prince in unknowing exile while Valentina is the usurper.
Recent takes on Snow White try to play up how she can be viewed as a female version of Horus, and the Evil Queen as a female Set. I think there is a lot more potential to be had from taking that approach. There is also Ashe in Final Fantasy XII.
So, those are my elaborations on Kyle's thoughts.
He also laments how we commonly fail to look for African inspiration for the story. The African legend he talks about, Sundiata, is pretty interesting and I think may well be relevant. But there is another Nation in Africa who's mythology has long been what the story of The Lion King first makes me think of.
Egypt, which called itself Kemet.
Simba = Horus
Mufasa = Osiris
Scar = Set
BTW, Scar is depicted as arguably vaguely Homosexual and Set's stories also have some homoerotic undertones to them.
Now we should remember that Set wasn't so firmly vilified originally. But because the Hyksos foreign occupiers favored him so heavily, Set's reputation took a nose dive during (most of) the New Kingdom. And in The Lion King the Hyena's could perhaps be viewed as representing those foreign oppressors.
Of course Egypt being one of the most Ancient nations on Earth, and which had long periods of influence and contact with other regions, means that this pattern was mimicked elsewhere quite frequently. And perhaps even Egypt didn't do it first, but from what we can verify their version was probably the first written down.
In Greek mythology there was Perseus who it seems may have originally been fathered by Proteus, the brother of Acrisius, not Zeus. Which in turn influenced Herodotus's version of the biography of Cyrus.
Kyle talks in the video about how every work has many ancestors. I feel like noting how a writer may not always be consciously aware of what's influencing them. I know because of who I've spent my time with I've spent a lot of time seeing and hearing movies and TVshows I would never have chosen to watch on my own. And I have vague memories of things I do not remember the name of, or maybe never knew.
Kyle chose Moses as a potential Biblical example. I would have picked David as a future King who spent time in Exile, though there is also Hadad of Edom in 1 Kings 11. And then Athaliah as a blatant Usurper. I also have a tendency to suspect Jehosheba and Athaliah are echoed in the tale of Snow White.
But also as a Christian I could compare this pattern to The Bible's overall depiction of Satan as the current Archon of the Kosmos and god of this Aion, having stolen the Dominion from Adam. And Jesus as The Son of Adam who will restore everything.
While Shakespeare's Hamlet fails to be like The Lion King or the story of Horus due to how Hamlet never takes the Throne or cares to. In the original Danish legend of Amleth he actually does become King.
Other plays of Shakespeare also echo this pattern. You can see it somewhat in the Henriad as Kyle points out. Macbeth, Richard III and King John are all plays where the title character is kind of the Set figure.
Paul Feval novels where this pattern is reflected include Revenants, and the DeClare story in The Blackcoats: Heart of Steele.
In Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope, the original backstory we are given made Anakin Skywalker and Darth Vader kind of surrogate brothers, students of the same master. In which case Anakin becomes Osiris, Vader is Set and Luke is Horus. Later when we learn the truth this analogy doesn't really change, Osiris and Set simply become two sides of the same person. Even the Dismemberment theme may go back to Horus castrating Set. So yes you can say that the voice of Mufasa had previously voiced Scar.
In Super Mario RPG The Legend of The Seven Stars, Mallow is a rightful prince in unknowing exile while Valentina is the usurper.
Recent takes on Snow White try to play up how she can be viewed as a female version of Horus, and the Evil Queen as a female Set. I think there is a lot more potential to be had from taking that approach. There is also Ashe in Final Fantasy XII.
So, those are my elaborations on Kyle's thoughts.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
WWE's GImmick PPVs
This is the first Wrestling post on this blog. My interest in Pro Wrestling tends to fluctuate. The last time I was following it even close to regularly was the year of Daniel Bryan, the build up to Wrestlemania 30 and the month or so after it. Because my Wrestling memories are often the most compartmentalized from the rest, I was kinda surprised when I did the math today and noticed that was before I started this blog. Shouldn't have been, as I obviously would have blogged about it if I was blogging back then, in fact this very subject was on my mind then.
Since then I've checked in here and there, but didn't feel compelled to stick around. The last week or so however I've been getting into it again. Yet not too able to get into actually watching any WWE programing.
Many have been complaining about WWE doing almsot only Gimmick PPVs, but my take is a little different.
On the issue of the Gimmick PPVs cheapening the match itself, I'd say that applies mainly to Hell in a Cell. Hell in a Cell should be a feud ender, not something that happens just because it happens to be October, and so we sometimes wind up with HiaC matches between people who barely met before.
If they want to happen to write the story-lines so that most of the time a Feud reaches HiaC capacity in October, that's fine, I can suspend my disbelief for that, in 2003 and 2004 we had HiaC in the same month two years in a row and I didn't complain. But actually calling the PPV Hell in a Cell means they don't need to justify the match in the writing at all, some happen to have it fit, but most don't. And doing more then one in the same event is overkill. Call the October PPV Bad Blood, like the event that introduced Hell in a Cell. Or revive Halloween Havoc, Vince owns that now.
Other matches simply don't feel interesting or Epic enough to carry a PPV. Like Ladder matches, as awesome as they are, none of the great Ladder matches were the actual Main Event of their PPV and there was a reason for that, those matches are best when done by mid carders still proving themselves. So that there have been two PPVs based on a variation of the Ladder match just shows how much that kind of match has become a crutch, especially in the PG era with it being the most exciting gimmick match where a lack of Blood doesn't feel like a disappointment.
However I am perfectly fine with Elimination Chamber having a PPV built around it. See any Gimmick match where the Gimmick requires more then two competitors I feel can have a PPV built around it. Feuds may be developed in the match but don't need to be the reason the match happens. Remember, two of WWE's big four PPVs were built around gimmick matches. Though one sadly often ignores it's founding gimmick.
My problem with Elimination Chamber is when in the year they're currently doing it. I hate it being between Royal Rumble and WrestleMania. I would like to go back to no PPVs between those two at all. But I especially hate having it almost guaranteed the Title will change hands (rarely does a defending Champion retain in an Elimination Chamber match). I want the Title Match of WM to be set in stone as soon as Royal Rumble ends, if a PPV has to happen in-between let it be something that puts WM opponents on opposing tag teams or something like No Way Out 98 did.
Maybe put Elimination Chamber a month and a half before SummerSlam, and make it not for the Title anymore but for the Title Shot at SummerSlam. Or put it in September, where WCW wound up settling on putting War Games for 93-99. Or make it the October PPV if they really want a guaranteed horrifying Cage match for the Halloween season.
Since then I've checked in here and there, but didn't feel compelled to stick around. The last week or so however I've been getting into it again. Yet not too able to get into actually watching any WWE programing.
Many have been complaining about WWE doing almsot only Gimmick PPVs, but my take is a little different.
On the issue of the Gimmick PPVs cheapening the match itself, I'd say that applies mainly to Hell in a Cell. Hell in a Cell should be a feud ender, not something that happens just because it happens to be October, and so we sometimes wind up with HiaC matches between people who barely met before.
If they want to happen to write the story-lines so that most of the time a Feud reaches HiaC capacity in October, that's fine, I can suspend my disbelief for that, in 2003 and 2004 we had HiaC in the same month two years in a row and I didn't complain. But actually calling the PPV Hell in a Cell means they don't need to justify the match in the writing at all, some happen to have it fit, but most don't. And doing more then one in the same event is overkill. Call the October PPV Bad Blood, like the event that introduced Hell in a Cell. Or revive Halloween Havoc, Vince owns that now.
Other matches simply don't feel interesting or Epic enough to carry a PPV. Like Ladder matches, as awesome as they are, none of the great Ladder matches were the actual Main Event of their PPV and there was a reason for that, those matches are best when done by mid carders still proving themselves. So that there have been two PPVs based on a variation of the Ladder match just shows how much that kind of match has become a crutch, especially in the PG era with it being the most exciting gimmick match where a lack of Blood doesn't feel like a disappointment.
However I am perfectly fine with Elimination Chamber having a PPV built around it. See any Gimmick match where the Gimmick requires more then two competitors I feel can have a PPV built around it. Feuds may be developed in the match but don't need to be the reason the match happens. Remember, two of WWE's big four PPVs were built around gimmick matches. Though one sadly often ignores it's founding gimmick.
My problem with Elimination Chamber is when in the year they're currently doing it. I hate it being between Royal Rumble and WrestleMania. I would like to go back to no PPVs between those two at all. But I especially hate having it almost guaranteed the Title will change hands (rarely does a defending Champion retain in an Elimination Chamber match). I want the Title Match of WM to be set in stone as soon as Royal Rumble ends, if a PPV has to happen in-between let it be something that puts WM opponents on opposing tag teams or something like No Way Out 98 did.
Maybe put Elimination Chamber a month and a half before SummerSlam, and make it not for the Title anymore but for the Title Shot at SummerSlam. Or put it in September, where WCW wound up settling on putting War Games for 93-99. Or make it the October PPV if they really want a guaranteed horrifying Cage match for the Halloween season.
Tuesday, February 21, 2017
I'm pretty Easy to Please
That's one of the main areas where I don't fit in among most people who feel the need to express themselves on The Internet. I don't think most of what Hollywood produces now is garbage, I don't think modern Anime is being ruined by Cute Girls, and I don't think Pop is destroying Music.
I have enjoyed the vast majority of fiction I've consumed. And I've fallen in love with a pretty large percentage of that. And I aboslutly hate only one particular movie that I do not wish to name. Most of the other things I may complain about have some significant redeeming qualities that I have no hesitation to acknowledge.
Of course maybe it only seems that way because I'm unintentionally good at avoiding what I wouldn't like. As much as I've been mostly only watching Anime lately, I'm not like an Anime YouTuber who feels the need to try at least the pilot of every new show. Over 100 new Anime come out every year and I've probably still seen less then 100 total.
There is no particular rhyme or reason to what I decide to check out. Maybe it was something in the description, maybe it was recommended by someone, maybe I saw a glimpse of it in a random YouTube video. Maybe it came from the same creators as something else I liked. It's pretty much all decided on a whim.
Still there are lately plenty of Anime I've started and not finished. But I have no hate for those anime, or even a strong dislike. They just didn't compel me enough.
Sword Art Online does a lot I really like, and a lot that really bothered me. The Mother's Rosario arc was the best, it had none of what generally bugged me about it.
You might think the point of making a post like this is to say it should really mean something when I do dislike something. But I'm not that presumptuous. The one movie I hate has it's group of defenders, in the past when I was less mature that bothered me, but I've grown up now and don't care.
I guess my point is I wish more people took my approach. If you can tell an Anime is the kind you'd hate from looking at the poster then don't watch it. If you hated the original movie don't watch the Sequel unless you feel you have good reason to expect it to be different. I have my own issues with Batman V Superman, but I have no interest in seeing it critiqued by people who spent 3 years hating Man of Steel, a movie I loved.
I've seem people make YouTube videos to specifically defend their Hate Watching of certain shows. And it just comes off as petty.
I realize professional critics have a perception that their reviews won't mean anything if they only give positive ones. But a traditional review is less then a page of text or a less then 10 minute video. You don't need half an hour to talk someone out of watching something.
What really bugs me though is how many Positive reviews nowadays are based on constantly referencing how something else was bad. The famous "Everything Wrong with" videos now have a channel doing the opposite, "Everything great about", (CineWins rather then CineSins). In concept that should be right up my alley. But the one on The Force Awakens is 50% "ain't it great how this isn't like The Prequels", which as anyone who knows me knows is the easiest way to turn me off.
And that's why simply telling me "don't watch/read the negative reviews" won't solve my problem, because internet negativity makes it's way even into positive reviews.
I guess the only point of this post is to tell people where I'm coming from. I'm a pretty easy person to satisfy, and I will never take that as an insult.
I have enjoyed the vast majority of fiction I've consumed. And I've fallen in love with a pretty large percentage of that. And I aboslutly hate only one particular movie that I do not wish to name. Most of the other things I may complain about have some significant redeeming qualities that I have no hesitation to acknowledge.
Of course maybe it only seems that way because I'm unintentionally good at avoiding what I wouldn't like. As much as I've been mostly only watching Anime lately, I'm not like an Anime YouTuber who feels the need to try at least the pilot of every new show. Over 100 new Anime come out every year and I've probably still seen less then 100 total.
There is no particular rhyme or reason to what I decide to check out. Maybe it was something in the description, maybe it was recommended by someone, maybe I saw a glimpse of it in a random YouTube video. Maybe it came from the same creators as something else I liked. It's pretty much all decided on a whim.
Still there are lately plenty of Anime I've started and not finished. But I have no hate for those anime, or even a strong dislike. They just didn't compel me enough.
Sword Art Online does a lot I really like, and a lot that really bothered me. The Mother's Rosario arc was the best, it had none of what generally bugged me about it.
You might think the point of making a post like this is to say it should really mean something when I do dislike something. But I'm not that presumptuous. The one movie I hate has it's group of defenders, in the past when I was less mature that bothered me, but I've grown up now and don't care.
I guess my point is I wish more people took my approach. If you can tell an Anime is the kind you'd hate from looking at the poster then don't watch it. If you hated the original movie don't watch the Sequel unless you feel you have good reason to expect it to be different. I have my own issues with Batman V Superman, but I have no interest in seeing it critiqued by people who spent 3 years hating Man of Steel, a movie I loved.
I've seem people make YouTube videos to specifically defend their Hate Watching of certain shows. And it just comes off as petty.
I realize professional critics have a perception that their reviews won't mean anything if they only give positive ones. But a traditional review is less then a page of text or a less then 10 minute video. You don't need half an hour to talk someone out of watching something.
What really bugs me though is how many Positive reviews nowadays are based on constantly referencing how something else was bad. The famous "Everything Wrong with" videos now have a channel doing the opposite, "Everything great about", (CineWins rather then CineSins). In concept that should be right up my alley. But the one on The Force Awakens is 50% "ain't it great how this isn't like The Prequels", which as anyone who knows me knows is the easiest way to turn me off.
And that's why simply telling me "don't watch/read the negative reviews" won't solve my problem, because internet negativity makes it's way even into positive reviews.
I guess the only point of this post is to tell people where I'm coming from. I'm a pretty easy person to satisfy, and I will never take that as an insult.
Thursday, February 9, 2017
I’m tired of people only seeing the worst of Internet comments and message boards.
Note for context, this is copy/pasted from a Tumblr post I made. But this version will be better proof read.
As a veteran of IMDB since 2003, I’ve had a lot to complain about, and did some of that right here on my Tumblr. But when I read TMS and Gawker pretty much agreeing with “Nothing of value was lost” I get offended.
I’ve met important Internet comrades there. I’ve learned much and had all kinds of fun conversations. And It’s played a role in how I’ve become a more liberal person. The beginning of the journey that lead to me creating my “The Bible does not Condemn Homosexuality” dissertation was in an IMDB thread.
And YouTube comments are frequently valuable too. Every successful YouTuber is thankful for the community that exists in their comments section.
Now as far as the desire to politicize this goes. I’m a little annoyed at all the Conservatives who act like censoring dissenting comments and justifying it with talk about petty hateful trolls is an inherently Liberal thing. There are Christian blogs I’ve been blocked from commenting on, and Forums and Facebook groups I’ve been kicked out of for expressing my dissenting view of the Bible passages presumed to condemn Homosexuality.
And as far as mocking people for being “Triggered” goes. That’s not uniquely liberal either. In one of those Facebook Groups there were literally people acting like they’re traumatized by my opinion of Homosexuality being allowed to stand as long as it was. They may not have used the same terminology but it was absolutely the same thing.
So no, you’re not actually gaining any SJW cred by being all for the shutting down of Internet discussion for fear of “Trolls”.
As a veteran of IMDB since 2003, I’ve had a lot to complain about, and did some of that right here on my Tumblr. But when I read TMS and Gawker pretty much agreeing with “Nothing of value was lost” I get offended.
I’ve met important Internet comrades there. I’ve learned much and had all kinds of fun conversations. And It’s played a role in how I’ve become a more liberal person. The beginning of the journey that lead to me creating my “The Bible does not Condemn Homosexuality” dissertation was in an IMDB thread.
And YouTube comments are frequently valuable too. Every successful YouTuber is thankful for the community that exists in their comments section.
Now as far as the desire to politicize this goes. I’m a little annoyed at all the Conservatives who act like censoring dissenting comments and justifying it with talk about petty hateful trolls is an inherently Liberal thing. There are Christian blogs I’ve been blocked from commenting on, and Forums and Facebook groups I’ve been kicked out of for expressing my dissenting view of the Bible passages presumed to condemn Homosexuality.
And as far as mocking people for being “Triggered” goes. That’s not uniquely liberal either. In one of those Facebook Groups there were literally people acting like they’re traumatized by my opinion of Homosexuality being allowed to stand as long as it was. They may not have used the same terminology but it was absolutely the same thing.
So no, you’re not actually gaining any SJW cred by being all for the shutting down of Internet discussion for fear of “Trolls”.
Friday, February 3, 2017
When They Cry/Higurashi the ideal Horror Anime
Strictly speaking I'm not a Horror fan. I've never been truly scared by any fiction I've consumed, nor have I ever sought that reaction. So the presumed main appeal of Horror stories does not apply to me.
But I have enjoyed many stories in the Horror genre for other reasons. I'm interested in the Sci-Fi/Fantasy elements they sometimes use, which overlaps with my interest in mythology and folklore, both real and fictional. I enjoy mysteries and thrillers and Hitchcock style suspense. And I can enjoy psychological horror because I like character pieces, I like exploring and developing interesting characters, and something like telling a story from the POV of someone slowly going insane from Paranoia can be an interesting way to do that.
But my lack of interest in most modern Horror tends to come from a deteriorating appreciation for the idea that "less is more". I get tired of endless Jump Scares and gratuitous blood and gore.
I'm also someone who has spent the last few years increasingly turning almost exclusively to Anime for my entertainment media. I haven't watched much Horror anime yet, a few that have horror elements but are still not chiefly about being horror, like Future Diary. And yes even the Zombie anime I talked about last year was not really a horror story.
But this last week I decided to check out Higurashi no Naku Korro ni (sometimes just shortened to Higurashi) rendered in English as both When They Cry and The Moment the Cicades Cry. This Anime has much of why I'm interested in Horror stories, and none of what commonly bugs me about them. And It's also had positive reviews from people who are Horror fans much more so then I am.
This show has some of the most notoriously gory scenes in all of Anime. But it uses those moments sparingly, building up to them and earning them. And it has exactly 1 scene that could qualify as a Jump scare, and even that is perfectly executed.
I'm not the only one who was reminded of The Wicker Man at certain moments (the original, I haven't seen the remake). And I suspect it has some Twin Peaks influence too. It is very much the Japanese version of a Gothic Novel. But it's also very creative and original, and non-linear. It's a period piece set in June 1983 but not constantly throwing the 80s in your face the way western TV shows set in the 80s do.
And that is my Spoiler Free recommendation.
Spoiler Warning.
I'm someone who often doesn't mind being spoiled, I'll intentionally read a book's afterward before the actual story. But if there is anything I've watched where I'm glad I wasn't spoiled going in it is this Anime. Because I was born in 1985 people don't believe me when I say I was surprised by Vader begin Luke's father when I first watched Empire Strikes Back. But my family didn't have access to the Internet till like 2000, and my parents were not into Star Wars, and I didn't have friends back then. But I can say being surprised by that scene did not effect my overall enjoyment of that film nearly as much as not knowing what's going on in Higurashi matters.
So I'm going to give a second spoiler warning, if you think you don't mind being spoiled, think really hard about that before reading on.
Spoiler Alert.
But I have enjoyed many stories in the Horror genre for other reasons. I'm interested in the Sci-Fi/Fantasy elements they sometimes use, which overlaps with my interest in mythology and folklore, both real and fictional. I enjoy mysteries and thrillers and Hitchcock style suspense. And I can enjoy psychological horror because I like character pieces, I like exploring and developing interesting characters, and something like telling a story from the POV of someone slowly going insane from Paranoia can be an interesting way to do that.
But my lack of interest in most modern Horror tends to come from a deteriorating appreciation for the idea that "less is more". I get tired of endless Jump Scares and gratuitous blood and gore.
I'm also someone who has spent the last few years increasingly turning almost exclusively to Anime for my entertainment media. I haven't watched much Horror anime yet, a few that have horror elements but are still not chiefly about being horror, like Future Diary. And yes even the Zombie anime I talked about last year was not really a horror story.
But this last week I decided to check out Higurashi no Naku Korro ni (sometimes just shortened to Higurashi) rendered in English as both When They Cry and The Moment the Cicades Cry. This Anime has much of why I'm interested in Horror stories, and none of what commonly bugs me about them. And It's also had positive reviews from people who are Horror fans much more so then I am.
This show has some of the most notoriously gory scenes in all of Anime. But it uses those moments sparingly, building up to them and earning them. And it has exactly 1 scene that could qualify as a Jump scare, and even that is perfectly executed.
I'm not the only one who was reminded of The Wicker Man at certain moments (the original, I haven't seen the remake). And I suspect it has some Twin Peaks influence too. It is very much the Japanese version of a Gothic Novel. But it's also very creative and original, and non-linear. It's a period piece set in June 1983 but not constantly throwing the 80s in your face the way western TV shows set in the 80s do.
And that is my Spoiler Free recommendation.
Spoiler Warning.
I'm someone who often doesn't mind being spoiled, I'll intentionally read a book's afterward before the actual story. But if there is anything I've watched where I'm glad I wasn't spoiled going in it is this Anime. Because I was born in 1985 people don't believe me when I say I was surprised by Vader begin Luke's father when I first watched Empire Strikes Back. But my family didn't have access to the Internet till like 2000, and my parents were not into Star Wars, and I didn't have friends back then. But I can say being surprised by that scene did not effect my overall enjoyment of that film nearly as much as not knowing what's going on in Higurashi matters.
So I'm going to give a second spoiler warning, if you think you don't mind being spoiled, think really hard about that before reading on.
Spoiler Alert.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)